this guy really peeved me. here is what he wrote. (you can see this in it's primary source here.)

Indeed, it is truly encouraging to see that the weaker sex are in agreement with me about the filthy uncleanness of their monthly menses. Surely their minds are not completely blinded to the Truth, and there is much hope. I do feel so privileged to have brought about such a changing of the heart in so many young ladies.

Now many have asked me to define the Truth. Alas, dear children, at the moment, your eyes are so blinded that you would not understand it, so I can only teach you in very small pieces at a time. But keep reading and you will be enlightened and reach true glory.

I have also been asked why the feminine sex are the weaker sex. Indeed, the difference between the sexes may be seen in the very notes I receive on my diary. The gentleman readers are aggressive, for they perceive me as one of their kind, but also different and stronger than they, so they wish to fight me. Despite my earthworm state, I have a passion and direction they do not yet have, and so am a threat to them.

The lady readers, on the other hand, do flirt with me and try to corrupt me and entice me with their feminine wiles and their unclean body glitter. For indeed, despite my earthworm state, I am still endowed with great masculinity which the weaker sex find hard to resist. My masculinity doth weaken them, and so they attempt to weaken me. But dear ladies, I will not be weakened and nor should you. Such unclean lusts are not to be encouraged. Keep thy minds pure and save the act of intercourse for the bearing of children in thy marriages.

and this was my response:

in response to my dear friend earthworm jim,

realize i speak this only to educate you, to teach you something you have no knowledge of. this something i intend to teach you is the sin of bigotry.

it is said that women are the weaker sex, however, fight that statement best as you can. this statement is the epitome of male chauvinism, one of the sectors of this evil bigotry. resist the ridiculous rules of society, which oppress the so-called "weaker sex." it is said men are aggressive; women luring, enticing, unclean, superficial. how can one label such a large group as such? this is not only bigotry, but also generalization, and such a thing is irrational, because there always exist exceptions to the rules. not all members of the female sex are lustful and superficial. countless women i know do not engage in covering themselves in "unclean glitter," or, makeup, as us normal people call it. i find it utterly ridiculous to call women and not men lustful, for not just women, and not just men, have feelings of lust at points in time. it is abnormal to not have such feelings, just as much as it is to have excessive feelings of lust. to claim all women are evil because of something natural which they cannot help is ridiculous. it is false proof to say that women are weak because of their menstrual cycle. it is unfair to say the menstrual cycle is unclean, for, if not for your mother's menstrual cycle, you would not be present. if your mother's menstrual cycle is unclean, then you, a product of a product of the menstrual cycle, are also unclean, regardless of whether you are male or female.

another sector of bigotry is not an obvious sector, but rather something which very often is a cause of bigotry. this sin is conceitedness. conceitedness results in feeling as if you are "superior" to everyone; feeling as if everyone else is "blind" and you are the only one who still has both eyes with which to see. usually when someone is conceited, it is he or she who is blind, and everyone else who at least has one eye to see with. to claim that you know the "truth" and that you cannot "teach" it is also considered being conceited, and not only conceited, but one of the deadly sins--it is greed. it is greedy to have something very valuable and withhold it from your fellow people. and to withhold it and say that you are above them, and so you must teach it them in order for them to be knowledgeable of this "truth," circles us back to conceitedness, which links us back to bigotry.

To the topic of truth, i say there is no such thing. rather, there is such a thing, there is just no set truth. there are many truths throughout the world. there are truths according to faith, which, even within that category, there are many, for there are many faiths which people are given the chance to follow; there are also truths according to science, which has solid, factual proof attached to it. the positive thing about science is that if they do not have solid, factual proof, they do not say it is "truth." faith, however, is all speculation. not to say that this speculation is untrue; simply that many people have many different kinds of speculation, and you know what? all these different people, with all these different speculations... are all right. they all speak the truth. truth is not something you can withhold from someone. truth is something we all hold, within ourselves; in our hearts, our souls, our minds. truth is not something which one person has and another lacks. truth is truth. something you cannot take away, nor can anyone else.

bigotry is astounding, and if i were god, i wouldnt let a soul who was a bigot to enter Paradise. sorry, "jim", you're, in my mind, going to burn with the rest of us, with your interpretation of "truth."

January 22, 2003